I really tire of your encyclopedias of posts, I really couldnt care less about what some 60 year old does with a broomstick or what you read in a paper about 'Nam or whatever.
I did wear our nations uniform, yes I have been to area of operation, worn body armour, salad bowl helmet and a steyr. I couldnt care less about your troubles coping with a cushy life.
What ****s me is people saying that the soldiers dont want to be there, its a volunteer force. By all means argue about the mission but dont plead the soldiers suffering card.
The point of the mission in Afghanistan is not really what we gain but we deprive the other side of. The other side is the enemies of freedom and liberty. And who would use anything and everything at thier disposal to strike at our home nations. They are out there and they must be stopped, if that a field in a remote village in afghanistan they cant use to teach militants on how to rig a dirty bomb for New York, Tel Aviv, London, Moscow, Berlin, Sydney or a corner store in punchbowl then that is a victory.
As for a question of how long, as long as it takes. As a question of how many, as many as it takes. As a question of the cost, whatever the cost. Victory was never gained by setting a pullout date, withdrawing after XX amount was killed or because the rations tasted like crap or someones feet hurt. Victory has always been gained by either annhilation from afar or by enduring the enemies fire, overcoming it, flogging the piss out of them and taking the field/creek/paddock/ocean. A successful war is very rarely achieved by a single victory, but a succession of victories. A tactical retreat can be executed but there is ABSOLUTELY no reason for such an action. To contemplate one at such a point in the war is cowardly and defeatist. You want retreat then you are a coward and a defeatist, no if buts or maybes.
Australia's role in Afghanistan is the same as it was in Iraq, supporting our allies and refusing to give ground to our and our allies enemies.