Patrol 4x4 - Nissan Patrol Forum banner

TD42 harmonic ballancer

1 reading
15K views 27 replies 11 participants last post by  Sydo  
#1 ·
Hi All... Researching the power upgrades of the TD42ti i came across the issue of snapped cranks.. the main fix it tip people suggest is replacing the flywheel with a lighter one(possibly aluminium)... Apparently this will adsorb the harmonics transferred through the crank from the firing of each cylinder. Isnt this what a harmonic balancer is designed to do? So rather than spending close to $1K on a lightened fly wheel.. Is there not an after market Harmonic balancer that can help with this issue?
Any responce would be appreciated.
 
#3 ·
Harmonic dampener is what you are chasing. UFI i believe do quite good one for TD42s.
While im no full bottle on the whole harmonic issue, it seems that people that have hardened flywheels seem to be snapping cranks a little more frequently.
If you are upgrade power at some stage you will need to do the clutch perhaps lighten and balance the factory flywheel and smash on a UFI dampener.


Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk
 
#8 ·
That probably contributed also but the harder steel reflects more harmonic vibration than a softer compound, such as mild steel or aluminum.

I recommend that you PM oldmav or ToughDiesels on here as they both have extensive knowledge on the subject and could point you in the right direction.
Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk
 
#14 · (Edited)
It kinda makes me laugh :p when people don't blink a eyelid at spending 6, 9, or even 12k or more on their truck to get it to move .
But then think spending a couple of grand to help it stay together after tripling it's power is like giving away there first born :roll: .lollollol.

.
 
#27 ·
Anyone tried the Ross ? @bambill
I installed one a few months back on my n/a td42 GQ as I had the front of the motor apart to fix a coolant leak. I cant comment on if its going help much as my td42 is still n/a until I fit the turbo kit. I liked that the Ross was a simple bolt on. Since bolting it on though I believe vibration through the car at idle has increased rather than decreased. My old damper was the original from 89 and had done 430K and seemed to soak up more vibration at idle. I have not noticed any difference when revving the motor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sydo
#25 ·
I contacted Ross about there balancer and inquired about the design criteria.
I rather got the impression that the main thing was to eliminate the tapper lock.
Hmmm, unsure why that is important.
But when I pushed further and asked about some torsional vibration design stuff, they said it was designed for 260kw at 6500rpm, lol.

Yes I have seen broken cranks with a ATI damper, not overly powerful engines, 200rwkw or so.
The ATI style does require tuning for the application, hence why they make different Orings, inertia weights etc.

And yes I have broken a crank with my viscous style damper, 2 infact, second one well, for all I know it was cracked when I put it in, never checked.
And my first one, think it was just tired when I pulled it out in 3 pieces lol.
 
#26 ·
I do enjoy my td, and can justify the money spent but I ain’t spending another squillion on a dampener.
If it pops it pops it will get shafted out for something else.

In saying that we do have a few cranks laying about between a few of us on stand by.