Ukrainian fighter attack on Boeing
- Status
1 - 20 of 124 Posts
Very interesting and entirely plausible.
Cheers
Justin
Cheers
Justin
Do you have any additional information to provide evidence to that claim? Location? Time of imagery? Eye witness statements? Aircraft being shot at?
Doesn't look to be a SU-27, MiG-29 or SU-25 assuming these would be the Ukrainian Airforce's air defence aircraft.
Doesn't look to be a SU-27, MiG-29 or SU-25 assuming these would be the Ukrainian Airforce's air defence aircraft.
errr, this has been debunked so often
the aircraft cited as doing the attack can't reach the altitude of the boeing .... and its weapons fit won't close the gap in altitude - let alone reach the incline and still have effect at termination
killed off in the majority of defence forums 3 months ago as wishful thinking
there's also the og so significant issue of effect damage on the boeing, destruction was forward and starboard - nothing on the Ukrainian frogfoots could achieve that - they're not wired up to do it.
killshot was made from the opposite direction of that "so called" Ukrainian fighter
the aircraft cited as doing the attack can't reach the altitude of the boeing .... and its weapons fit won't close the gap in altitude - let alone reach the incline and still have effect at termination
killed off in the majority of defence forums 3 months ago as wishful thinking
there's also the og so significant issue of effect damage on the boeing, destruction was forward and starboard - nothing on the Ukrainian frogfoots could achieve that - they're not wired up to do it.
killshot was made from the opposite direction of that "so called" Ukrainian fighter
So regardless of who did it it seems you can more or less get away with shooting down civilian aircraft.
Interesting times indeed.
Cheers
Justin
Interesting times indeed.
Cheers
Justin
Please excuse my lack on knowledge on both war and their weapons, but,
1. How has it taken this long for these pictures to come to light?
and 2. It seems awfully ironic these images were made public, (American, English or Russian), on the eve of G20 while Putin has warships loitering off Aus.!
1. How has it taken this long for these pictures to come to light?
and 2. It seems awfully ironic these images were made public, (American, English or Russian), on the eve of G20 while Putin has warships loitering off Aus.!
Totally agree
When Americans need, they all see
U.S. say downed Russian plane was possibly hit by Ukrainian missile, Ukrainian officials deny
U.S. say downed Russian plane was possibly hit by Ukrainian missile, Ukrainian officials deny
Don't agree with the theory at all, but that is a Su-27
it doesn't matter whether its a klingon bird of prey
the damage to the boeing is starboard front - its a kinetic proximity kill
no aircraft in the Ukrainian (or Russian airforce equiv) has the capacity to use the missiles in their current armouries or able to released from that aircraft that can close that meeting gap, head to the other side at an equiv distance, come back in and explode in the opposite direction
if you want to suspend physics and start folding time and distance with a wormhole then thats about the only way you can pull it off
the main missiles available to the SU-27 (or Su34 if the russians want to start claiming another change to the story) don't have co-operative engagement capability, they don't have the energy and capability to go ahead and come back in on the boeing - and more to the point - the signature destruction left by an air to air missile is a tad different to a large SAM
and not to put too fine a point on it.
on the various defence sites I moderate on (one has a russian moderator and the other had a ukrainian moderator (now unfort deceased as a result of the conflict) both had evidence that shows the Buk launcher fully loaded prior to the shootdown (with local population complaining about why it was there) to post shoot down shots where the same mobile launcher minus one Buk is videoed heading back across the border to russia under an escort
it doesn't matter whether that imagery has the battleship pontemkin flying across the landscape - the weapons fitout for the platform cannot achieve the kill based on the damage to the Boeing. ie the attack came from the starboard forward area and slightly above the aircraft ****pit.
as well as when this was first touted the conspirators were alleging that it was an Su24 - when it was pointed out that the Frogfoot neither had the weapons fitout or flight performance to close the gap and release missiles (the wrong kind of missiles) the story magically changed to it being an Su27
give it time and they'll be blaming the estonians, latvians, lithuanians or poles.
the damage to the boeing is starboard front - its a kinetic proximity kill
no aircraft in the Ukrainian (or Russian airforce equiv) has the capacity to use the missiles in their current armouries or able to released from that aircraft that can close that meeting gap, head to the other side at an equiv distance, come back in and explode in the opposite direction
if you want to suspend physics and start folding time and distance with a wormhole then thats about the only way you can pull it off
the main missiles available to the SU-27 (or Su34 if the russians want to start claiming another change to the story) don't have co-operative engagement capability, they don't have the energy and capability to go ahead and come back in on the boeing - and more to the point - the signature destruction left by an air to air missile is a tad different to a large SAM
and not to put too fine a point on it.
on the various defence sites I moderate on (one has a russian moderator and the other had a ukrainian moderator (now unfort deceased as a result of the conflict) both had evidence that shows the Buk launcher fully loaded prior to the shootdown (with local population complaining about why it was there) to post shoot down shots where the same mobile launcher minus one Buk is videoed heading back across the border to russia under an escort
it doesn't matter whether that imagery has the battleship pontemkin flying across the landscape - the weapons fitout for the platform cannot achieve the kill based on the damage to the Boeing. ie the attack came from the starboard forward area and slightly above the aircraft ****pit.
as well as when this was first touted the conspirators were alleging that it was an Su24 - when it was pointed out that the Frogfoot neither had the weapons fitout or flight performance to close the gap and release missiles (the wrong kind of missiles) the story magically changed to it being an Su27
give it time and they'll be blaming the estonians, latvians, lithuanians or poles.
I did not understand, my Google translator badly translated
about rockets beech, if the plane hit the beech, the set submunitions would be stuck in dead bodies and aircraft parts
but so far no one has presented this evidence
Americans and the satellites do not care about this disaster now
about rockets beech, if the plane hit the beech, the set submunitions would be stuck in dead bodies and aircraft parts
but so far no one has presented this evidence
Americans and the satellites do not care about this disaster now
when I refer to starboard side of the Boeing thats from a meeting point perspective - ie head on
from the onboard plane perspective for the Boeing itself, then its the port side, ie the left
note the altitude of the "su-27"
compare length of su-27 to a Boeing 777 (its about a third)
if you extrapolate the physical length of the supposed su-27 with the boeing 777 you can start to establish the altitude difference.
note that the initial claims 3 months ago were that the attacking jet was a Su24, then it was an Su-25 - that was pilloried as nonsensical and it then became an su27 to fit the narrative
now it varies between a Mig29 and an Su27.
if its a mig29 then the weapons options are even more limited
meanwhile a Buk mobile launcher missing one of its missiles is still an issue that gets ignored
plus, a satellite image showing missile release at that kind of resolution?
and finally, the passenger jet shown is more likely a 767 - not a 777 - so nice bit of photo shopping of multiple map overlays and multiple image insertion(not)
so good luck believing the image is kosher....
finally, this initially was IP traced back to russian forums early october - it never came from the US
from the onboard plane perspective for the Boeing itself, then its the port side, ie the left
note the altitude of the "su-27"
compare length of su-27 to a Boeing 777 (its about a third)
if you extrapolate the physical length of the supposed su-27 with the boeing 777 you can start to establish the altitude difference.
note that the initial claims 3 months ago were that the attacking jet was a Su24, then it was an Su-25 - that was pilloried as nonsensical and it then became an su27 to fit the narrative
now it varies between a Mig29 and an Su27.
if its a mig29 then the weapons options are even more limited
meanwhile a Buk mobile launcher missing one of its missiles is still an issue that gets ignored
plus, a satellite image showing missile release at that kind of resolution?
and finally, the passenger jet shown is more likely a 767 - not a 777 - so nice bit of photo shopping of multiple map overlays and multiple image insertion(not)
so good luck believing the image is kosher....
finally, this initially was IP traced back to russian forums early october - it never came from the US
and for the curious
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/201...on-shares-fake-images-of-mh17-being-attacked/
http://thinkmorebetterer.wordpress....lite-photo-prove-mh17-was-shot-down-by-a-jet/
http://www.whathappenedtoflightmh17.com/proof-the-russian-tv-satellite-photo-of-mh17-is-fake/
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/de...raine-mig-29-shot-down-mh17.5107/#post-134103
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/201...on-shares-fake-images-of-mh17-being-attacked/
http://thinkmorebetterer.wordpress....lite-photo-prove-mh17-was-shot-down-by-a-jet/
http://www.whathappenedtoflightmh17.com/proof-the-russian-tv-satellite-photo-of-mh17-is-fake/
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/de...raine-mig-29-shot-down-mh17.5107/#post-134103
No one in Australia has forgotten about it. It is still very much in the media and on peoples minds. It's just the Russian media you see that has forgotten about it
1 - 20 of 124 Posts
- Status
Join the discussion
Join now to ask and comment!